professional critics of Islam with great career opportunities, despite or perhaps because of the recession - Von Till-R. Stoldt
about the new West-saver with the paranoid view of the world
We are lost. Europe is on its way to the Islamized Eurabia. The return of the Middle Ages is a matter of time. And the brain-washed Germans do not even dare to rebel against. It forbids them the politically-correct attitude dictatorship. Who dares to muck the other hand, is branded as enemy aliens. See Thilo Sarrazin. Fortunately, however: A few are still upright. Islam critic, ex-Muslims, said Sarrazin, or the Swiss with their referendum against mosque minarets. Quite dead So it is not freedom. About So lets describe the mood in parts of the German public - fueled by high-circulation publishers, internet networks and movements (somewhere between quite popular and rather extreme), the longest in the Federal Republic's mainstream . radiate into And in some ways, what haunts the seer, puts even a grain of truth. recorded
Because they believe, however, far more than a little to have is, unfortunately, only a decision to make about it: your world is good for the ideological foundation for mass deportations, delusional religious cleansing and endless suffering. For this reason, they also deserve attention. Because we can not allow that anger is directed partially understandable in view of immigration from Muslim countries in fanatical channels.
Let's start with the often quite honest concerns of critics of Islam. Of course it is shocking, if as a result of immigration from Islamic countries, this country, bad habits, such as forced marriages and honor killings at home, or if it is driven up mainly by immigrant youth violence in Germany. But one must then ask whether this is really a result of "Islamic" immigration.
Why does not the idea of Islam critic to recognize the difference between Muslim migrants from urban middle class and those deep in the mountain village of province? And why is Islam so consistently opponents refuse to consider for decades LOST integration policy as a cause of today's ills to even?
allegedly because non-Muslim immigrants have become more integrated under the same conditions. But this is wrong. Italian descent have as much education as deficiencies of Turkish origin. German and Russia were for many years the undisputed brutal youth group of the Republic.
But the Islam-critical tunnel vision does not it true. For him there is only what fits into the grid. So Bring a jealous Turkish origin to his ex-wife, it is Islam, according to critics, of course, a "Muslim practice." The fact that the alleged Muslim was known as a drug-addicted casino regular, who had for years been seen from inside a mosque is deliberately overlooked. Guilt is "Islam".
The incredible simplicity of this statement pattern you have to keep the religious warriors always in mind. Moreover, one can not suppress the relations, when reporting the crimes committed by migrants. An example: the number of all known in this country with honor killers (another diffuse) Islamic background represents less than 0.01 percent of behalf of Muslims living here. conceal this systematically, is slander.
And yet another concern of critics of Islam deserves attention. The action, the dictates of political correctness forced to conceal the grievances among Muslims. Again, this should be taken seriously. That in Germany until the eleventh day of September 2001, a backlog of open criticism of Islam was probably not in fact be quite wrong. The bent transition to undermine the flight path of fascism club came from home. And in many contemporaries who like the experience of past days still resonate today.
Only: For the Germany of 2010, this warning does simply not the case. Always new church representatives and union leaders protest to the Chancellor (after all, a religiously neutral state), her 'no' to EU membership for Turkey is also clear from their Christian identity. And no one, not even Claudia Roth, this would be called fascist. So where is the official PC-dictation?
But where the government distanced itself from attack Islam or Muslims really was, as in the case Sarrazin, as was the criticism only the unmistakable intention to formulate as brutal. Is brutality as a value in itself?
For so obviously some do. For the "Man-is-so-well-can-still criticize the Muslims-"-attitude to strikes. Gradually, the call is threatening to open criticism of Islam in a battle song of the spiteful turn. Yes, talk shows, parliaments and journalism is spreading far so undifferentiated as rough-disrespectful Tone toward Muslims from. It does not contribute to peace, when the Greens announced Daniel Cohn-Bendit, it was time, "the Muslims something to pop in front of the bib. Also, it hardly promotes peaceful coexistence, if the writer Ralf Giordano always intoned again, it was far too long submissive to these archaic Muslims.
And it reflects neither expertise nor differentiation will, that in some diet, such as NRW, the headscarf ban to the flat-flat-Note was founded, women wearing headscarves are all too often enemies of human dignity (which by nothing at all is used). Here's the democratic mainstream has constructed at random still danger and the same marks clearly visible.
Its base is replaced by the hostility of Islam, however, in a representation of the Koran and the Prophet, which is different from insult any more. So the Prophet Muhammad by so-called experts alternately reviled as a "caravan robber," "murderer" and initiator of "genocide".
be taken to the extreme, these attacks with the bold claim that such judgments are no doubt at all true Islam experts. Significantly these assertions are usually from non-specialist critics of Islam. In fact, in Germany there are no four holders of Islamic Studies Department, who would share such a view.
Lastly, the Prophetenbeschimpfern everything that belongs to the scientific standard equipment: the ability to synoptic reading the Koran, the historical context of events that took place 1,400 years ago, or simply the willingness of the Prophet in doubt, do not in principle be placed under less favorable motivation.
first release on 19:01:10 in: THE WORLD, courtesy of the author and editor
