the fact that the crime scene of all the regional court of Dresden and colleagues took Tatzeugen were judges, defenders Michael Storm on Monday in vain for the cause of an application if suspected of partiality to the trial court. The fact that the act has shocked the judges and prosecutors, of course. Whether they can impartially judge W. is at least a permissible legal one. What Was the second defender, Veikko Bartel from Potsdam, however, following that request, offered a staggered the language.
literally Bartel: "We must ask why this Defendant has killed. This must not close our eyes to the social circumstances in the country. If the client is a lone fanatic with xenophobia? Maybe. But there is also the image of Islam in politics and media. I'm not talking about the attacks in 2001, but by the daily reports of bombings. "For the Muslims conquer every time" embarrassed silence "when it in honor killings and calling for attacks mentioned. An "image of mercy" Islam is not just offer. And this must eventually be considered in favor of the accused.
In other words: Muslims are to blame but themselves.
Such counsel does not need the German judiciary. The procedure in Dresden is a hawk watched by international media, which can give the board a clear picture of an independent and fair justice system in Germany - if it is not distorted by this kind is disruptive. Mr. Bartel was chosen by the defendant, said in Dresden. Who actually paid for his fee? The Hartz IV recipients W. certainly not.
http://www.spiegel.de/panorama/justiz/0, 1518, pressure-657 498, 00.html
Alex W. brachte Marwa um on
http://germania1.livejournal.com/634.html
